On the home
page of the EliteMarathoning.com website I make the following statement:
“In early 2012, I decided to publish my training
and racing philosophy for the marathon as a website rather than as a
book. This way it can be kept in a more dynamic setting and updated
in real time when advancements are made, thus never letting the philosophy
go static, but rather let it always be evolving and advancing. It is my
sincere hope that this site can be a good reference tool to others (runners and
coaches) and help them reach their full potential in marathon running.”
-
Coach Mark Hadley
I mean every
word of that quote and in particular a couple of phrases in there: “dynamic
setting”, “never letting the philosophy go static”, “evolving and advancing”,
go deep to the heart of my coaching philosophy.
I never want to stop learning, to stop thinking, to stop exploring this
sport. Every experience should bring a
deeper understanding, and every conversation spark a new way of looking at
something. I want my mind to churn for
days on end with new ideas, tweaks to old ideas and to pour over all possible scenarios. And through this, continue to advance and
refine my training and racing philosophy for the longer distances so I can be even
more effective at helping runners reach their potential in these races. I see it as an intellectual challenge, wrapped in a
mission of service and stewardship.
Three things close to the core of my being.
Advancements
For the past
several months I have been working on some refinements and advancements to a
few aspect of my training philosophy.
This is not a whole sale change of any aspect by any means, but rather further
refining aspects to make it more effective at producing the desired
results as efficiently as possible.
Yesterday I
rolled these advancements/refinements out on the EliteMarathoning.com website,
and today I want to explain them on this blog and have included them on my Maximum Performance Running site as well.
Stress Workout Training Paces
As distance
runners specializing on the longer races distances (Half Marathon to Marathon),
our lactate threshold and aerobic threshold (collectively - our stamina) are the areas of
primary concern for us and much of our success will be based on how much we can
improve these thresholds over time. So we work regularly on these
threshold paces, with 8 of the 16 stress workouts listed in the “Workout” page of
the EliteMarathoning.com website dedicated to improving these thresholds.
But in order to support the improvement of these thresholds, we also
need to regularly work paces moderately slower and faster than these threshold
paces. To this end I have refined my philosophy to include 3 stress
workout training paces faster than these thresholds, and 3 slower than these
thresholds, to uniformly support their continued improvement.
We want to
select training paces that are sufficiently different enough from one another
that they cause a change in blood chemistry (i.e. lactate levels, etc.) and/or
energy usage characteristics so that we are working targeted physiological
systems from significantly different angles, thereby maximizing the
effectiveness of different work we do.
In taking a long look at this, I have decided that, for longer distance
runners, that significant change in pace we are looking for is the difference
between our lactate threshold (LT) and aerobic threshold (AT) paces or roughly
a 4-5% change in pace. So I utilize this
change (between LT and AT) as my base unit for pace changes.
This gives me
the following breakout for training paces by stress workout category:
Stamina
Workouts
Lactate
Threshold (LT): the pace we can hold for
60 minutes in an all-out effort (i.e. race)
Aerobic
Threshold (AT): the pace we can hold for
120 minutes in an all-out effort (or roughly 4-5% slower than LT depending on
predisposition).
To these paces
I add a 1% range (on the slower side) in order to allow for some small
variations and progressions.
This workout
category did not change. I still utilize
the same paces and workouts in this category as I had previously used.
Speed Workouts
If we define
the change between LT and AT as 1∆ (AT
pace – LT pace = 1∆) than our speed workout paces are as follows:
LT - 1∆: This is speed used for Groove Repeats
LT - 2∆: This is the speed used for VO2 Max Repeats
LT - 3∆: This is the speed used for Fast Repeats
Note: see the “Workout” page on the
EliteMarathoning.com website or the "Training Paces" page on the MPR website for details on each workout type
Example: If LT pace is 5:45 per mile and AT pace is
6:00 than :15 = 1∆, so our 3 speed workout paces would be:
LT - 1∆: 5:30
(5:45 - :15)
LT - 2∆: 5:15
(5:45 – (2 x :15))
LT - 3∆: 5:00 (5:45
– (3 x :15))
Similar to the
stamina category, I add a 1% range (on the slower side) in order to allow for some
small variations and progressions.
LT - 1∆: 5:30-5:33
LT - 2∆: 5:15-5:18
LT - 3∆: 5:00-5:03
So how does
this compare to what I used previously?
The Groove repeat pace is almost exactly the same but with a slightly
smaller range, the VO2 Max Repeats are on the faster end of the range I used
previously (and closer to true vVO2 Max), and the Fast Repeats are slightly
faster than previously utilized. I have
tweaked the durations of some of these workouts in accordance these minor
pace changes. In most cases my current athletes
will not notice any change to their Groove or VO2 Max workouts and a slight
increase in speed with accompanying small reduction in volume in some of their Fast
Repeat workouts.
Endurance
Workouts
If we define
the change between LT and AT as 1∆ (AT
pace – LT pace = 1∆) than our endurance workout paces are as follows:
AT + 1∆: This is the pace used for Quick Pace Long
Runs
AT + 2∆: This is the pace used for Steady State Long
Runs
AT + 3∆: This is the pace used for Moderate Pace Long
Runs
Note: see the “Workout” page on the EliteMarathoning.com website or the "Training Paces" page on the MPR website for details on each workout type
Example: If LT pace is 5:45 per mile and AT pace is
6:00 than :15 = 1∆, so our 3 endurance workout paces would be:
AT + 1∆: 6:15
(6:00 + :15)
AT + 2∆: 6:30 (6:00 + (2 x :15))
AT + 3∆: 6:45 (6:00 + (3 x :15))
Similar to the
stamina category, I add a 1% range (on the slower side) in order to allow for some
small variations and progressions.
AT + 1∆: 6:15-6:19
AT + 2∆: 6:30-6:34
AT + 3∆: 6:45-6:49
So how does
this compare to what I used previously?
This area includes some of the bigger refinements I am making, as I have
added a completely new category of endurance workout, the Quick Pace Long Run,
and I am very excited about it. The more
I see, experience, study, coach and talk with other coaches, the more I realize
the importance of the quality aspect in our endurance work. To that end, the pace I utilize for the
standard “easy pace long run” as sped up just slightly and is now called
Moderate Paced Long Runs. Steady State
Long Runs have been left virtually unchanged expect for a narrowing of the pace range,
and we have added a Quick Pace Long Run to give additional work to energy
systems usage closest to marathon pace. The duration of each workout has been slightly adjusted accordingly. Lower mileage runners will still mainly
utilize the 2 slower paced versions of this category, but the inclusion of the
new workout type should greatly enhance the preparations of the higher mileage
runners.
Calculations -
No Worries
No worries on
trying to figure out and calculate your LT and AT and other paces. I have done the math for you, based on your
recent race times and predisposition. I
have attached training pace charts and equivalent race time charts on both the
EliteMarathoning.com and MPR websites.
Predispositions
Additionally I
have refined my explanation and use of predispositions in determining training
paces and race times.
Given equal preparation, how much an athlete slows down as
the race distance gets longer depends on many individual variables ranging from
muscle fiber make-up, to bone structure, to mental wiring and personality. Some
people’s minds and bodies are better suited for longer races (HM and Marathon)
and some for shorter races (5k and 10k). I call this aptitude towards
different distances their natural predisposition.
It only makes sense then that our natural predisposition
will play a large part in what our potential is in the marathon and other races. If
we have 2 people with the same 10k PR but one has a shorter distance
predisposition (person A) and one has a longer distance predisposition (Person
B), then Person B will have better potential in the marathon than Person A, and
Person A will have greater potential at the 5k than Person B. Different predispositions helps explain why
Desi Davila and Shalane Flanagan were pretty evenly matched in the 2012 Olympic
Trials Marathon, but Shalene has a 10k PR a minute faster than Desi. This also helps explain why Dick Beardsley
could run even with Alberto Salazar in the marathon when he might have been
lapped by Alberto in a track 10k. Desi
and Dick may simply have greater long distance predispositions than Shalane and
Alberto. Similarly, people who could run with even with Paula Radcliffe
over 5k and 10k (granted there were not many of them) generally had a short
distance or neutral predisposition while Paula has a long distance
predisposition, so she was able to beat them by multiple minutes in a marathon
race. This doesn’t mean that a person with a longer distance predisposition can’t
run very good at shorter races (Paula was exceptional at 5k and 10k), it just
means that their potential is better at the races closer to their
predisposition (Paula holds the WR in the marathon, as would make sense given
her predisposition).
Doing some research and investigation on this subject over
the last several years, I have made some general findings. The typical neutral
predisposition distance runner will slow roughly 4.5% each time the
distance is doubled (starting at 5k) if they are equally as well prepared for
each race distance. Being "neutral" means they will fair roughly the
same in equally competitive races at different distances from 5k to the
marathon.
With 4.5% representing neutral, I find the standard range
to be roughly 4.0% (long distance predisposition) to 5.0% (short
distance predisposition). This range
can make a big difference in the athlete’s potential at various distances. If
we you use a 31:00 10k as our base time we see that a runner with a short
distance predisposition may only have 2:24:54 marathon potential (slowing 5.0%
each time the distance doubles), but a neutral predisposition may have 2:23:20
potential, and runner with a long distance predisposition may have 2:21:46
potential. That is over 3 minutes difference
in marathon potential for runners with the same 10k time.
While there may be a few individuals who fall outside of
this 4.0% to 5.0% range (Paula actually is closer to 3.5%), I think the range
captures 98% of all serious distance runners. I break this range down
into 3 sub-categories:
Long Distance Predisposition: slows roughly 4.0% - this runner fairs better against his/her
peers in the longer races (half marathon and marathon)
Neutral Predisposition: slows roughly
4.5%- this runner fairs about the same against his/her peers in all distance
races (5k - marathon)
Short Distance Predisposition: slows roughly 5.0% - this runners fairs better against
his/her peers in the shorter races (5k and 10k)
My terminology is distance running specific so “short
distance” is 5k-10k and “long distance” is the half marathon-marathon.
It is important to note that all of this assumes the runner
is equally as well trained for each distance. This will not be the case
for a lower mileage runner, as 60 miles a week will not allow you to be as well
prepared for a marathon as it will for a 5k or 10k. For this reason it is hard
for some recreational or even sub-elites to fully judge their predisposition
based strictly on race times.
Our predispositions are not something that we can
influence or change to a great degree, rather it just shows us what distances
we are naturally best off focusing on for greatest potential success. This
can be very valuable information for a runner and/or coach to have.
Understanding a runner's predisposition also helps a coach
and athlete to understand the appropriate paces to use in training. For
example, if I coach 2 runners with 31:00 10k PR's, but one has a long distance
predisposition and the other a short distance predisposition, and I send them
out to do a 10 mile aerobic threshold (AT) tempo run, the appropriate pace will
be different for each of them because of their predispositions even though their
10k times are the same. The runner with the short distance predisposition will
need to do this workout at about 5:30 pace while the runner with the long
distance predisposition can probably handle about 5 seconds per mile faster on
a similar effort. Similarly if we are
doing some VO2 Max repeats the runner with the shorter distance predisposition
will probably be able to hit slightly better times than the longer distance predisposition
runner. Knowing the runner's predisposition helps in setting expectations and
to avoid over-training.
You will
notice on both my websites that there are 3 versions of the training pace and
equivalent race time charts, one for each main predisposition. If you are not sure of your predisposition
then I suggest using the neutral predisposition charts until see evidence to
change from that
Workouts
One final refinement to my training philosophy is that I have
added 2 workouts to the mix of workouts I regularly utilize in my training
programs. These two workouts are the addition of the Quick Pace Long Runs that I mentioned earlier, and the second
workout is a hill repeat workout that I have used for some time, but never
formalized as a specific workout on my websites.
Quick Pace - Long Run
Workout:
continuous long run done at a quick pace
Pace:
AT + 1x pace (AT plus the difference between AT and LT paces)
Duration:
Between 50% and 70% of your marathon race time (i.e. 1:30, etc.) up to a
max of 120 minutes.
Benefits:
Improves glycogen storage capacity, improves energy usage efficiency at a
quicker pace, advances cardiovascular fitness and cellular adaptations
Use:
Used sporadically in the fundamental phase and regularly in the specific phase
of training for a marathon.
Example:
if AT pace is 6:00 and AT + 1 is 6:15, than 90 minutes at 6:15 pace
Hill Repeats
Workout: Repeats of between 1:00 and 2:30 in duration, done up a hill,
totaling between 15 and 21 minutes in total.
Hill: hill of a moderate grade (3-5% slope) - roughly 6-10 seconds per
400 meters slower than flat.
Pace: roughly LT - 2x (VO2 Max Repeat pace) (LT minus 2 times the difference
between AT and LT)
Recovery: a slow jog back down the hill to the starting spot.
Benefits: Improves stride economy and power, stress aerpbic power (VO2 Max)
Use: Used frequently early in a training cycle to build power and as a
good way to breakthrough a plateau on fitness later in the cycle.
Example: If LT pace is 5:30 and LT - 2x is 5:00, than
12 x 1:30 uphill at 5:00 pace with jog down recovery
Additional Explanations
Additionally training pace and equivalent race time charts are
available on both of the follow locations:
Onward and upwards my friends, and loving every minute of it!
Happy Running!
Coach Mark Hadley
